Education and Identity Term Paper Pages:
Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy, ed. The University of Chicago Laboratory School is one of the most distinguished pioneer schools of the progressive education movement. This entry discusses the history of the school, its purpose, and its teaching philosophy and methods.
The school, since October officially called University Elementary School and since Octoberincluding a sub-primary department, grew continuously, reaching its peak inwith children predominantly of the wealthy and educated classes23 teachers, and 10 graduate students as teaching assistants.
In OctoberDewey appointed his wife Alice principal of the school. Blaine and headed by Francis W. Because of her unprofessional conduct and poor management, less because of the issue of nepotism, Alice Dewey faced such powerful opposition, in particular from the former Parker school faculty representing more than 70 per cent of the teaching staffthat Harper had no other choice but to ask for her resignation as school principal.
Dewey, anyway frustrated by administrative duties and the failure to shape the consolidated school according to his own ideas, resigned too and left Chicago in May for a professorship at Columbia University, New York City. The ultimate aim Dewey strived for with his experimental school was laying the foundation for a reform which would revolutionize the educational system and, over time, transform the society into a great democratic community.
Parents who feared their children might be misused as guinea pigs were reassured that the school did not experiment with children, but for children. Apart from serving as an educational laboratory, the school felt obliged to bestow a sound and liberal education upon the students in its care.
Didactic and Psychological Premises Dewey, a mild-mannered philosopher and psychologist who had failed as a high school teacher because he could not persuade his adolescent students to behave and learn properly, did not give the Laboratory School teachers detailed instructions on what and how to teach; he rather provided them with general principles and suggestions for developing a vital and innovative curriculum.
Inspired by Herbartian precedents, Dewey devised a didactic scheme consisting of three components: The psychological, that is, the natural impulses and interests of children that could be utilized for attaining their attention and moving them to accept as their own the topics, tasks, and projects proposed by the teacher 2.
The sociological, that is, the social attitudes and practices the students should know about to succeed in life and play their part in a social and participatory democracy 3. The logical, that is, the organized contents and methods the students should study to understand the substance of subjects and the structure of science needed to survive in and contribute to the advancement of an industrial and progressive society.
All three elements had to be thought of and striven for at the same time, or else the teacher fell short of her educational mission. Dewey identified four interests and activities every child possessed: In addition to didactic considerations, Dewey made use of two psychological concepts.
Ideally, children acquired new knowledge and skills naturally by experiencing real life situations at first-hand. Yet mere action and activity were not enough.
For if the continuous interaction with the environment was interrupted, and if the use of familiar precepts and routines was hindered, the individual would stop, analyze the problem, search for an alternative, develop a strategy of action, and try to overcome the hindrance by applying the plan that had emerged.
Coping with problematic situations by thinking and doing, children would learn, retain, and retrieve significant information definitely better than using the traditional methods of memorizing and reciting. Learning Through Occupations At the Laboratory School, the students were to grow emotionally, socially, and intellectually in ways that had continuity with both their previous experiences and their present lives.
To provide the basis for active and cheerful learning, diverse measures were implemented: Instead of beginning with reading, writing, arithmetic as is traditionally done, the lessons at the Laboratory School concentrated from the start on topics and issues pertaining to actual life and the meeting basic human needs like food, clothing, and shelter.
In accord with the theory of culture epochs, the curriculum followed nature, while the children relived the stages it was believed that mankind had taken in hundreds if not thousands of years as the race moved from from being hunters and collectors to being farmers, craftsmen, and manufacturers.
In cooking, for example, the students learned and practiced reading when they wished to decipher cookbooks, writing when they wanted to record their favorite recipes, and arithmetic when they had to count eggs, weigh flower, and measure milk. The occupations in cooking, weaving, sewing, and gardening, woodwork and metalwork were lifelike, yet had to be simplified, purified, and enriched so that the children were not overtaxed in their mental ability, damaged in their moral growth, or captivated in their narrow world-view.
In fact, the occupations were conceived so broadly that they integrated considerable subject matter in literature, art, history, geography, chemistry, and physics, and included excursions to parks, farms, and factories, to libraries and museums, with the objective of extending the horizon of the students beyond the familiar and the immediately necessary.
Moreover, the teacher chose and suggested problems and situations of such nature that the students had to pass through the complete act of thinking and doing and to refer to knowledge and experiences of past and present generations i.
At the Laboratory School, the teacher had to alter her professional attitude and to take over new roles and functions. For her students, she was not a taskmaster and disciplinarian who relied on compulsion and punishment, on grades, examinations, and certificates, but a leader and guide in exciting and challenging activities.
And with regard to her associates, the teacher was not an individual working and striving on her own but a person closely cooperating with her colleagues to coordinate the diverse elements of teaching into coherent learning units.
Especially due to the small classes consisting of 6 to 12 students, the atmosphere at the school was liberal, relaxed, and stress free, and phenomena like indifference, indolence, and want of discipline that rendered traditional teaching so demanding and aggravating apparently disappeared or decreased to a negligible degree.
Innovative but Not Exceptional The Laboratory School underwent numerous modifications that responded to intricate or defective structures.
Five modifications occurred during the first two years of its existence: Since then the students had few and limited opportunities to influence curriculum and instruction.
They were, in turn, appointed group leaders and took, in absence of the teacher, responsibility for law and order, but seldom were they engaged in projects, like furnishing a model colonial room or building the famous clubhouse, that required genuine team work and significant collaboration in planning, deciding, and executing; and rarely were they allowed to choose between alternative topics and activities or decide autonomously what they wanted to do.This short essay focuses on education within schools and universities during the Second World War in order to explore the relationship between war and learning.
From its proud history spanning more than two centuries, Middlebury College has emerged as one of a handful of the most highly regarded liberal arts colleges.
On the uses of a liberal education: 1. as lite entertainment for bored college students. September 1, Harper's Magazine. Mark Edmundson. A college student getting a liberal arts education ponders filling out a questionnaire that includes an opportunity for him to evaluate his instructor.
The first disadvantage of an elite education, as I learned in my kitchen that day, is that it makes you incapable of talking to people who aren’t like you. Essay on Friend: Education and Students. times to use non-authoritarian types as well.
I believe that the type of students that a teacher has in his/her classroom determines much of their teaching styles. Discuss Undeniably, identity is a matter as most of people are willing to sacrifice their life to claim or protect their own identity (Woodward, , p.
7). There have been a number of sociologists and researchers concerned to shed light on the pattern of identity.