Social control theory vs self control theory

They also asserted that most delinquents eventually opt out of the delinquent lifestyle as they grow older, suggesting that there is a basic code of morality in place but that the young are able to deviate by using techniques of neutralization, i. The five common techniques were: Later Matza developed his theory of "drift" which proposed that people used neutralization to drift in and out of conventional behaviour, taking a temporary break from moral restraints. Matza based his "drift" theory upon four observations which were:

Social control theory vs self control theory

I. Introduction

Review of the Roots of Youth Violence: Literature Reviews Volume 5, Chapter Social Control and Self-Control Theories 11 Social Control Theory Social control theory gained prominence during the s as sociologists sought differing conceptions of crime.

It was during this period that Travis Hirschi put forth his innovative rendering of control theory, a theory built upon existing concepts of social control.

As such, social control theory posits that crime occurs when such bonds are weakened or are not well established. Control theorists argue that without such bonds, crime is an inevitable outcome Lilly et al. Unlike other theories that seek to explain why people engage in deviant behaviour, control theories take the opposite approach, questioning why people refrain from offending Akers and Sellars, As a result, criminality is seen as a possibility for all individuals within society, avoided only by those who seek to maintain familial and social bonds.

According to Hirschi, these bonds are based on attachment to those both within and outside of the family, including friends, teachers, and co-workers; commitment to activities in which an individual has invested time and energy, such as educational or career goals; involvement in activities that serve to both further bond an individual to others and leave limited time to become involved in deviant activities; and finally, belief in wider social values.

These four aspects of social control are thought to interact to insulate an individual from criminal involvement Siegel and McCormick, Those seeking to test the strength of this theory as it specifically relates to young people have closely examined bonds with family, schools, community, and religion to determine the extent to which such bonds impact offending.

The following discusses a selection of the literature on social control theory as it pertains to youth delinquency and offending. Parental Attachment Social control theory is situated amongst other sociological theories that focus on the role of social and familial bonds as constraints on offending.

It is proposed that for young people, a key aspect of social control is found within the family, particularly through interactions with and feelings towards parents.

Of the studies that have examined the impact of social control on delinquency, a large proportion has found a negative relationship between parental attachment and delinquency. As such, it has been found that the greater the attachment to parents, the lower the likelihood of involvement in delinquent behaviour.

It should be noted that out of all of the studies reviewed for this report, only one found that parental attachment had no effect on delinquency Brannigan et al.

In their study on the effects of adolescent male aggression during early adolescence on later violent offending, Brendgen et al.

More specifically, the authors were keenly interested in examining how parental monitoring impacted aggression leading to later violent offending.

The sample of Caucasian males from Montreal was assessed by their teachers with respect to aggressive behaviour.

Social control theory vs self control theory

Self-report data were also collected from respondents approximately three and four years later, at the ages of 16 and 17, regarding the perpetration of physically violent offending. The extent of parental supervision and caregiving exhibited were also monitored at various junctures during this study period.

In contrast, adolescent partner violence was associated with reactive aggression, or aggression categorized as defensive behaviour in response to perceived aggression. The authors further found that adolescent males who experienced less monitoring by parents were more likely to demonstrate proactive aggression and violence later on in adolescence.Jun 12,  · Social Bonding Vs.

Self-Control By: Erica Hutton The following discussion considers the dissimilarities evident among the Social Bonding Theory and the Self-Control Theory. Travis Hirschi’s () social control theory is known as the social bonding theory in which a collaboration of elements interact with one another in.

Introduction. The "General Theory" of self-control posited in Gottfredson and Hirschi (see General Overviews) has spawned a broad array of research and General Theory provides scholars with a set of testable propositions. The first proposition outlines the dimensions of self-control.

In criminology, social control theory proposes that exploiting the process of socialization and social learning builds self-control and reduces the inclination to indulge in behavior recognized as antisocial.

hypothesis that Self-Control Theory is more apt at explaining delinquency than Social Control Theory.

Social control theory vs self control theory

However, the two theories taken together are stronger yet. Self-control theory—often referred to as the general theory of crime—has emerged as one of the major theoretical paradigms in the field of criminology.

This is no small feat, given the diversity of criminological perspectives that exist in general and the ever-growing roster of recently sprouted control . Social control theory assumes that people can see the advantages of crime and are capable of inventing and executing all sorts of criminal acts on the spot.

Hutton Criminal Profiling & Associates: Social Bonding Vs. Self-Control