Two Experiences Rekindle the Debate. Fancy digs on the A What could possibly ruin this? Even more astounding is how many of these kids are traveling in first or business class.
The places they do allow smoking might lose a bit of money, but it will also help with the health problems that occur. Most people beleive that someone who is not in the smoking area of the public place will not be affected by the smoke, but smoke is able to spread in a room and affect the people around.
Smoking causes alot of problems not only for the smoker, but for the people around. If someone were to put together a protest for those to stop smoking in public, I bet that every non- smoker would say they should.
Oh and by your logic, if someone is a pyromaniac and always has the need to light fires that its ok for them to run around in public with fire, the non pyromaniacs just need to avoid the fire. No big deal right? I would not say that smoking should be banned, but I do not think it is necessary that people should go as far to have to avoid another person purely for them being a smoker.
What I think they should do is just go back to a smoking section with air vents leading upwards and away from people Why public smoking should be banned the smoking section, making it less likely that if a door is opened to the smoking section, that smoke will go out.
Also, businesess are not losing a little bit of money, there are bars that have been there for years all around me that are being completely shut down. All because people will not go there because they cannot smoke.
Yes, it should be banned Obviously, the cloud of smoke exactly disturbs other people; especially non-smokers feeling. It should be banned because the percentage of non-smokers is higher than active smokers so non-smokers have right to clean air and also second hand smoke is more dangerous than actually smoking as well.
All of the older kids smoke so the youger kids like to be influenced by the Juniors and Seniors.
They will eventually start and gett into the habit of smoking. Its also very unhealthy. Secondly, being in a restaurant and having to smell that smoke while eating is not only disrepectful but also disturbing and once again not healthy. I respect those who smoke away. In fact, accordintg to some reliable surveys, numbers of smokers are rapidly increasing these day.
|You are here:||Do you think smoking should be banned outside school? Standing up for a cause you believe in can be hard, particularly if it means maybe standing up to adults!|
|Why Smoking Should Be Banned in Public Places||Like most people, you already know that smoking is bad for your health.|
Of course, we can smoke if this will affect no one. We together make some tigh and strict regulation for smokers if we dont want to have any adverse influences on our next generations. For example, many countries around the world, especially tropical nations, like Cuba as well as England consider cigarette as an important product to export to many other countries to get money or exchange other commodities.
As a result, this can bring some jobs for people and partially solve rate of unemployment. Say in a restaurant they have a smoking area even with ventilation.
The larger the area, the larger the vent, the larger the vent the more powerful it needs to be, the more powerful it needs to be the louder it is.
This would disrupt the non smokers as its just an annoying noise created to feed the poor addicts their poison. But what if we wanted to dull down the power or remove the vent all together?
No a manager does not NEED to go through and would then be making it their own decision, but the other staff still needs to do their job. It is bad enough that smokers get to go outside every 30 minutes to smoke for minutes while non smokers have to work work work work all day without those breaks.
Yes, it is a real problem. The smoke bothers every non-smoker. But a complete ban is not necessary.
I mean, those public places can save up some money so they can build special areas for non-smokers and those areas would be vent.
This way would thank both parts: So if somebody wants to smoke, let him do. And by using this special areas for smokers, everyone would be happy and the restaurants would make profit. But i hope i proved my point.
By smoking in public places all the people that go to those places have got to inhale their smoke although they have a made a choice to not smoke, they dont have a say in whether smoking will be a part in our life or not. BUT if it was banned smokers could smoke in their home and cars, and harm themselves and not others.
Sorry if it didnt make sense, but i think u will get the points that i was trying to make. People who have asthma need to carry their inhaler just in case of a smoker or cigarettes. We are a county built on equality, why are you taking my right of being cancer free away?
We fought for our independence and im glad we have it! The second amendment means you have the right to bear arms, and a cigarette is like a gun. Even though cigs are bad, they are classified as a harmful weapon that can cause serious injury or damage.Should smoking be banned?
If not, why? Read on the find out our thoughts after weighing the pros and cons of each. Should smoking be banned? If not, why? Read on the find out our thoughts after weighing the pros and cons of each.
Ban smoking in public places and cars, let smokers do their thing inside the comforts of their home. But to ask. A California lawmaker has positioned himself as an ardent supporter of e-cigarettes. U.S. Congressman Duncan Hunter, a Republican from California, says e-cigarettes and vaporizers have helped him quit using tobacco and should be spared from prohibitive legislation.
Smoking Should be Banned in Public Places Smoking in public places causes a considerable number of sicks to people and the government should be doing more to protect its citizens.
Smoking has several harmful effects on the body. 1 Questions and Answers on HUD’s Smoke Free Public Housing Proposed Rule Q: Why is HUD publishing this proposed rule?
A: HUD has been advocating for smoke free housing since in all of its programs because the health. They’re part of a larger trend banning smoking at outside, public areas.
In fact, smoking has been banned in parks and more than beaches in the last two decades. When answering the question of whether or not something should be banned, we must look at the what is being lost in the world of the stakeholders while that action or thing is still being permitted.